Chateau Miraval court battle between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt continues to unfold in a U.S. court, with both sides now arguing over how soon the case should go to trial.
The disagreement centers on the French estate Chateau Miraval, a property once shared by the Hollywood actors and later turned into a wine business. What began as a joint investment has now become a long-running legal dispute focused on ownership rights and a contested sale.
Court filings show Brad Pitt is pushing for an earlier trial date. He argues that delays are interfering with his ability to use and enjoy the property. In his view, the ongoing case has already created enough uncertainty around the estate and its operations.
Pitt’s legal position is straightforward. He says the case should not wait until 2027 and claims the drawn-out timeline is affecting what he describes as his “quiet enjoyment” of the French home.
He also raises concerns about the wine business attached to the estate, saying that a new co-owner has created tension and disrupted how the operation runs. Pitt’s filings suggest that waiting longer only deepens the impact of the dispute on both the property and its business value.
Angelina Jolie has pushed back against the request to speed up the trial. Her position is that there is no strong legal reason to move the case forward earlier than planned.
She has proposed a trial date in September 2027 and argues that the current schedule allows enough time for both sides to prepare properly.
Jolie also disputes Pitt’s claims about disruption. She says there is no evidence that his use of the estate has been affected by the legal proceedings.
The disagreement also extends to court scheduling details. Pitt’s legal team suggested that a later trial date could create conflicts with Jewish High Holidays and potentially affect witness availability. He also pointed out that some witnesses are older and one has already died, which he says makes delay more complicated.
Jolie’s filing challenges parts of that argument, noting that Pitt did not identify any specific lawyers who would be affected by the holiday period, despite being represented by a full legal team.
A judge has not yet made a decision on whether to move the trial date forward or keep the current timeline. Until then, the Chateau Miraval court battle remains open-ended, with both sides holding firmly to different views on how and when the case should proceed.
The dispute continues to reflect how a private business disagreement between two high-profile figures has turned into a prolonged legal process with no immediate resolution in sight.
